The expiry date on a Degree: Why Online Education must evolve faster than the skills it teaches

Dr. Ramakrishnan Raman
Banner

For decades, a university degree worked like a passport — earn it once, and it would carry you through a career. Graduates trusted that what they’d learned would stay useful for years, maybe decades. That assumption doesn’t hold anymore.

Artificial intelligence, automation, cloud computing, data analytics, cybersecurity, digital transformation — these are reshaping industries faster than most institutions can keep pace with. A skill that’s in demand today can be irrelevant in three years. So the real challenge for higher education isn’t handing out degrees. It’s making sure graduates stay employable long after they’ve received one.

Online education, oddly enough, is well placed to meet that challenge. But only if it rethinks what it’s actually for.

Start with a misconception that refuses to die: that online degrees are somehow lesser than campus-based ones. They aren’t. The University Grants Commission (UGC) has made clear that degrees and diplomas earned through recognised Open and Distance Learning (ODL) and online modes carry the same standing as conventional, on-campus qualifications. Employers, institutions and learners alike need to stop treating legitimacy as the question.

The real question is whether the curriculum keeps up. And on that front, universities aren’t really competing with each other anymore. Their biggest rival is a six-week industry certification.

Ask a prospective learner what they’re weighing up, and increasingly the answer isn’t a two-year online degree; it’s a focused certificate from a respected tech company, refreshed every few months, built around current tools, and shaped directly by employers. Tech companies have gotten good at renewing their content quickly, updating it as their platforms change. Universities, by contrast, often need months or years to revise a syllabus, slowed down by regulatory approvals and governance layers. By the time a new curriculum reaches students, some of it is already dated.

This isn’t just a curriculum problem, it’s a structural one. If universities want to stay relevant, online education can’t just be a digital copy of the lecture hall. Recording a lecture and posting a PDF isn’t transformation; it’s digitising an old model. What’s needed instead is education that’s modular, personalised, and built to keep evolving.

Curricula should be reviewed every year, or more often in fast-moving technical fields. Degree programmes should build in industry-recognised micro-credentials, so graduates leave with academic depth and skills employers can immediately recognise. And learners should be able to stack certifications over time , treating education as an ongoing process rather than a single event.

AI adds a genuinely new capability here: the ability to personalise learning at scale. Adaptive platforms can spot where a student is struggling, adjust the path accordingly, give real-time feedback, and offer something close to individual tutoring. Not every learner needs the same route through the material ; technology finally makes it possible to tailor that route to the person and their goals.

Also Read: Why are Indian students rethinking overseas education in 2026?

Closer ties with industry matter just as much. Employers shouldn’t just hire graduates at the end of the process, they should help design the curriculum along the way: contributing case studies, running live projects, and validating that what’s being taught actually holds up on the job. The gap between classroom and workplace needs to keep shrinking.

Assessment needs rethinking too. Exams, as traditionally designed, mostly test memory and recall. What employers actually value — problem-solving, creativity, collaboration, ethical judgment, the ability to keep learning — isn’t captured well by that format. Online education is well suited to alternatives: simulations, portfolios, project-based work, and assessments built around real-world problems.

Perhaps the biggest shift, though, is a philosophical one. Universities need to stop treating graduation as the end of the relationship with a student. In today’s economy, education isn’t a one-off transaction ,it’s a lifelong arrangement. Alumni should be able to come back years later for short modules, new certifications, or interdisciplinary programmes as their careers evolve.

The institutions that thrive won’t be the ones that simply graduate students — they’ll be the ones that keep teaching them.

In the end, an online degree’s value over the next decade won’t come from how well it imitates a physical classroom. It will come from how fast it adapts — to new knowledge, new technology, and a workforce that keeps changing shape. In a world where skills expire, the institutions that last will be the ones that make sure learning doesn’t.

By Dr. Ramakrishnan Raman, Vice Chancellor, Symbiosis International (Deemed University)

"Exciting news! Elets technomedia is now on WhatsApp Channels Subscribe today by clicking the link and stay updated with the latest insights!" Click here!