Page 1191 – Elets digitalLEARNING
Home Blog Page 1191

The Relevance of Internationalisation of Indian Higher Education


Internationalisation is the crucial need of higher education with systematic approach to maximise the relevance of education

Interest in foreign education gained a big boost in March 2010 with the Cabinet approval of a bill to allow entry of foreign education providers in India. Although the bill is still awaiting approval by the Parliament, it has already created a sense of excitement not only among students but also among many institutions in India and abroad. However, there are some who are skeptical about the need and relevance of internationalisation in the Indian context. I argue that a national policy on internationalisation of higher education is needed to maximise the relevance and benefits at three primary levels: infusing excellence, encouraging diversity and capacity building. 

Jane Knight defined internationalisation as 'the process of integrating an international, intercultural or global dimension into the purpose, functions or delivery of post-secondary education.' This definition clarifies that internationalisation is much broader, comprehensive and flexible concept. It recognises and encourages diverse approaches and accepts that there is no prescriptive formula of internationalisation for all institutions. Context of India is different and hence the concept of internationalisation should be adapted to the unique challenges and needs of the country and institutions.

Infusing Excellence

There is no denying the fact that Indian higher education is struggling to infuse quality at the systemic level and it has limited itself to a few islands of excellence of IIMs and IITs. Consider the recent case of the 100 percent cut-off requirement by Sri Ram College of Commerce, Delhi for admission to undergraduate program. Instances like this, question the whole rhetoric that Indian higher education is reforming and expanding access. Indian institutions are facing a crisis of confidence where many students are aspiring for the same set of select few quality institutions.

A systematic approach to internationalisation May help in bringing global good practices and more institutions with higher quality. For example, within a decade ISB, Hyderabad has emerged as an inspiration (sometimes envy) for many other Indian institutions. It is a hallmark of adopting global practices ranging from admissions to teaching, research and governance. In a country where absolute scores are still considered the only benchmark for admissions, ISB adopted a holistic admissions process along the lines of best B-schools by integrating personal interviews and essays. This expanded choice for many talented students who would have gone abroad for studying MBA programs and not coming back. The unfortunate part is that existing regulatory structure had tried to restrict the ISB model and growth.

Dr Rahul Choudaha is Director of Development and Innovation at World Education Services, New York

He is responsible for strategic development, product innovation, research and thought leadership. Dr Choudaha is a higher education specialist with focus on institution building and strategic development, international collaborations and market development. He earlier worked in international recruitment and marketing at the Indian School of Business, Hyderabad.

Dr Choudaha earned Ph.D in Higher Education from the University of Denver, MBA (Marketing) from NITIE, Mumbai and BE (Electronics & Telecom) from Jabalpur Engineering College.


A national policy on internationalisation should encourage diversity of location,programmes and institutional types


Encouraging Diversity

Indian post-secondary education is facing acute quantitative and qualitative challenges at two extremes. On the one extreme is skill-based vocational education and on the other is research-based doctoral education. Of course, lack of funding and policy focus remains a concern, but another major reason is the lack of quality in these programs, which restricts labor market rewards. This in turn leads to a socio-cultural environment of only respecting and encouraging professional fields like engineering and management. Thus, internationalisation had been concentrated to a handful of institutions in bigger cities having business or engineering programs.

A national policy on internationalisation should encourage diversity of location, programs and institutional types. Policy directions should create incentives for institutions interested in engaging with fields like agriculture, energy or urban planning or types of institutions like vocational institutions or location of institution in non-metro cities. For example, Montgomery College is leading an initiative of advancing community college model in India with the help of a grant funded by US-India Education Foundation (USIEF). Thus, internationalisation policy should facilitate opportunities beyond traditional models, level of programs, types of institutions and fields of studies.

Capacity Building

There are several approaches to internationalisation depending on mission and resources of an institution and one of the approach internationalisation policy May pursue is capacity building. Here capacity building refers to the creation of an enabling environment of resources (financial, technical and human) and regulatory framework which is line with the national needs.

Consider the case of some of the country-level partnerships have been focusing on enhancing educational and research engagement with India. For example, a delegation of university presidents from Canadian universities committed $4million for India specific engagements and the UK has renewed The UK India Education and Research Initiative (UKIERI). These engagements will bring together critical resources for Indian institutions to learn and develop their practices. Similarly, technology has transformed the communication and content delivery mechanism and it could be a major source of engaging open courseware through www.ocwconsortium.org  with limited resources.

The Way Forward

Indian higher education needs a comprehensive internationalisation strategy both at the national level and at institutional level. Like any new initiative, there will be some risks of misuses. For example, there May be institutions, which misrepresent, over-commercialise and perhaps make higher education unaffordable in the name of internationalisation. However, the test of a good policy framework is to have an ability to distinguish wheat from the chaff. In other words, internationalisation of higher education is relevant to the needs of the country and a mature policy environment, which encourages innovation and experimentation but restricts misrepresentation is much needed. It is high time for Indian higher education at policy and institutional level to reflect on how best to leverage the concept of internationalisation and engage it to achieve the goals of excellence, diversity and capacity building.

Honouring Life,Light and Learning

Loynpo Thakur S Powdyel
Minister of Education, Bhutan

I had often thought – this was it! The light was retreating. Learning was rapidly becoming an irksome afterthought. I have often wondered why everything else takes the centre-stage but the very source of light should be consigned to the back-stage! It still worries me that almost everything else makes news but the noble sector only becomes relevant when something goes wrong in the society. I have often wondered what might have been the state of our world if Education had received its due.

As a soft pillow beneath my aching head comes the first ever Global Education Summit. It should have happened a thousand years ago! But 'the flag flies still and the city has not fallen'! Here, I have found a ray of hope. We can still redeem the sector noble and launch a new civilization.

I would like to offer my deepest tributes to the enlightened minds that saw the reason for this event whose time has truly come. I commend the initiative taken by the Indira Gandhi National Open University, the Centre for Science, Development and Media Studies, and Elets Techno-media Pvt. Ltd. to host this historic Summit. It is a blessing to the world. Its value and its symbolism speak for themselves.  

Education May not be as news-worthy as the stock market or sports or tsunami. It May be less dramatic than HIV/AIDS or bush-fire or earthquake. But given its due and pursued with honour, the light of learning can redeem the world. I am deeply heartened that the Summit creates a precious space for the meeting of minds and sharing of dreams dedicated to making our world a better place for our children and our children's children and beyond.

Education is at the crossroads of a complex kind today. The attitude to learning and the outlook of the learner often call into question the viability of the whole educational mission. With the rapid 'mercantilization of knowledge' and commercialization of learning, the core function of the noble sector is coming to be governed by the laws of corporations and the employment market. Change of vocabulary says it all: Are your graduates marketable? Are they employable? Are they saleable? How much further away could we be from the call to build faith and character, to learn the skills of usefulness and to cultivate the virtue of gracefulness that should define an educated person? Scholars have become commodities!

The essentially normative architecture of education is being rapidly dislodged by the linear logic of economic efficiency with the result that if a life-affirming discipline is at the same time economically not viable, there are not only fewer takers, but its support and succor May be compromised. However, mundane and mercenary a course May be, if it has a material carrot dangling at the end, it does magic! One May wonder, therefore, what, after all, is the purpose of education? Why do we occupy young people for nine months out of twelve in schools, colleges, and universities if the goal is nothing more than simply getting a job, as important as it is?


If a nation has a dream, it falls primarily upon its education system to  uphold it and to advance it


The Global Education Summit May do well to look back and to look ahead for a more entire view of the human person and of the society of human beings

Towards Building a Global Knowledge Society

Education is one of the most powerful celebrated drivers for reducing poverty, economic disparity, inequality and for laying the basis for unrelenting sustained economic growth. It is fundamental towards building vibrant democratic societies and globally competitive economies. For individuals and for nations, education is the key to create, disseminate and share knowledge. Despite grim challenges of means and resources, our nation has created a very large education system and has built up a vast pool of global citizens equipped with a high order of scientific and technological capabilities, robust humanist and philosophical creativity.

While the XIIth five year plan promises to ensure 'inclusive growth', and resolves to provide quality education to all, in an effort to fulfill the educational needs of the country specifically for the diverse societies and cultures of the country, the government has chalked out different educational categories like school, higher, tertiary, vocational, skills, technical etc. Amartya Sen recently emphasised education as a crucial parameter for any inclusive growth in an economy. In terms of both education policy reform and incremental domestic and international financing, we should have our focus more on inclusive rather than divisive growth strategies. Access to quality basic education is imperative not only to reduce social and regional disparities, but also to achieve balanced growth and development.

The country has the extreme situation of having the largest number of illiterates and out of school children in the world. In answer to this, there have been initiatives towards ensuring that the learning needs of all young people and adults are met to fair and judicious access to appropriate learning and life skills programmes. Community participation has also emerged as a force behind the existing educational opportunities. In order to have measurable learning outcomes achieved, especially in literacy, numeracy and in essential life skills, there is a need to have a comprehensive approach towards ensuring quality and excellence in education. In the present day context, we do have a transparent system that provides for a conducive learning environment supported with higher level of community participation. Teachers are effectively graduating to be facilitators of learning.

It is critical to have at least a growth rate of 9 to10 per cent per year in the economic sphere, necessitating the requirement for human skills, especially the research skills. We are happy to be part of a magical decade where there will be no compromise with respect to enrolment and retention of students. For this there must be 100 per cent literacy and 100 per cent enrolment at all levels of education. For this the rural sector is being mobilised and encouraged in the cause of education.

The optimistic scenario entails that India will have a well established education system at the elementary, secondary and tertiary levels to be able to develop manpower for different levels of the economy worldwide. Having added 203 million to the population of the literates during the decade 1991-2001, India has definite capability to reach near 100 per cent literacy level by 2025. This ambitious target would call for learning from global experiences of more open, flexible and supplementary routes having an appropriate mix of skills and academic knowledge. In the US, according to the latest statistics 46 percentage of the students go to the Universities through the two-year community colleges which have grown bigger than some of the premier universities over there. The Open University of China for example offers full-time, part time and spare time two-year and three year degree programmes in addition to various modular, certificate and diploma programmes. More than 50 percent of the students enter into higher learning in the Universities through these two-year degree colleges in China.

I feel privileged to share with you all that the special issue of digitalLEARNING magazine will be presented at the World Education Summit 2011. While we, as a nation, are going through an interesting phase of transition with various reforms in education, we strive to share and exchange our knowledge and best practices with the countries across globe specially the emerging ones in Africa, East Asia, South America and the Gulf. As the Guset editor, I urge all of you to come and share your vision towards building a truly global knowledge society. 

 With best wishes,

V N Rajasekharan Pillai

Convergence of Thought Leadership across the Globe

The Millennium Development Goal of Universal Primary Completion by 2015 is by no means the only challenge in front of education systems across the world. It is only the first step toward the definitive goal of lifelong learning for all citizens, which is as relevant for the poorest countries of the developing world as it is for the countries of the developed world.  With an endeavor of so much promise and reform, this special issue of digitalLEARNING is being presented at the World Education Summit, which is a confluence of global thought leaders to mull over the issues pertaining to the global education scenario.

All countries, no matter how far they are today from universal primary completion, must simultaneously invest in and promote the balanced development of all levels of their education systems. In a globally integrated and highly competitive world economy, multi stakeholder partnership initiatives can be effective in supporting and even expediting the ongoing education reforms for a more sustainable education system. Irina Bokova, Director General, UNESCO has emphasised that the partnerships of education programme have several assets. It is an effective advocacy channel and provides the tool to strengthen the understanding and coordination between stakeholders.

With a vibrant global education community working towards realising education opportunities for all, there is a need to raise awareness and support the implementation of relevant, sustainable and scalable national education sector plans on a global level through the increased commitment of the private and public sectors.
India is undergoing a wonderful transition period in education with guided by a visionary leadership. With the passage of the Foreign Education Provider Bill, establishment of the campuses of Indian institutions outside the country, coming over of global schools with foreign alliances, Indian education has certainly become globalised both inwards and outwards. The world in which we live today, demands global education for our students. Our geopolitical environment and economic fates are getting increasingly inter-connected. This situation clearly indicates that one needs to develop a new set of competitive skills to become a global workforce. The influence and prominence of the Indian students has already long been established on the global forefront.

It is about time for us to share our lessons, practices and ideas with each other globally and to convert these efforts into a sustainable way to not only promote global harmony but also to bring the global community on a united platform. It is indeed a historical and proud moment for the digitalLEARNING magazine, having covered a journey of more than six years, as it sets to present the World Education Summit 2011 in India along with IGNOU. We welcome all of you to join, share and contribute to the larger spectrum of education that has already gained momentum.

faculty Deficit in higher education

There is an urgent need to focus on shortage of teaching faculty in higher learning, which can be done by attracting top rank holders in universities and institutions of higher education

We are on the threshold of a new era in the history of human civilisation. An era dominated and often driven by knowledge. Access to knowledge and an ability to use it for one’s own advantage have become more important than access to natural resources and capital. The emerging knowledge economy depends critically on the ready availability of adequate human resource with the right knowledge and intellectual skills.

India with a billion plus population and a varied demography has an excellent window of opportunity in this new economy. However, our educational system needs to be substantially upgraded to impart globally competitive training if we have to make use of this opportunity. India has seen major investments and promises of new investments in higher education in the recent times both by the government and by the private sector. The biggest challenge for India is however, the non-availability of competent faculty to teach in these institutions. This challenge defies simple and quick-fix solutions since, it takes several years of hard training to groom a competent teacher in any branch of higher learning. It is a well known fact that a career in teaching begins late with the average age of person being close to 30.

The increasing number of career options, attractive salaries in  some other streams of employment that are high in demand, globalisation of the market place for trained people, all dissuade potential students to take up teaching careers. The salary scales and the career options in a teaching position offer little to offset the disadvantages of late entry. Consequently, the best of students today have little motivation to take up higher education and research leading to teaching as a career.  This will only lead to further shortages of good quality teachers in the coming years. Any corrective measure will require several years to show results. Clearly, there is an urgent need to attract the best students to teaching careers with reasonable opportunities and a nurturing career option. While it would be difficult to match corporate compensation packages, the teaching profession at the highest level has always had an aura to attract committed students and it is this attraction that one should make use of while removing some of the well known disincentives.

A good measure could be targeting the top rank holders  in universities and other institutions of higher learning such as the IIT’s, IISER’s, IIM’s etc. having a first class masters degree in basic sciences, social sciences and humanities, first class bachelors degree in engineering, medical sciences and other equivalent degrees. Within one month after declaration of results, by a process of interviews or personal discussions, admit about 200 candidates (crème dela crème) as Junior Faculty Interns for a period of two years and depute them to pursue M.Phil. or M.Tech. in selected Institutions of Higher learning. During this period, they are attached to a guide/mentor and 20 percent of their time is to be devoted to teaching assignments (tutorials, lectures, assignments, student guidance, etc.). The Junior Faculty Interns are to be paid a stipend equivalent to the total emoluments of a lecturer in a central university. On successful completion of Stage I as a Junior Faculty Intern for two  years, and after an evaluation of the candidates for a teaching career, they  should be admitted for Ph.D. in selected Institutions as a Senior Faculty Intern.  Again, working under a guide or mentor, they will devote nearly 20 percent  of their time in teaching-related activities. A Senior Faculty Intern would be  entitled to a stipend equivalent to the total emoluments of a senior lecturer  in a central university. On successful completion of Stage II as a Senior Faculty Intern and after an  Evaluation of the candidates for a teaching career, they should be deputed to leading Institutions in India and abroad for two years for Post-Doctoral studies. On successful completion of Stage  III and after an evaluation of the candidates  for a teaching career, they should be offered Assistant Professor positions  in any of our Institutions of higher learning. In addition, the candidates should also be provided a start-up research  grant. A limited horizontal induction at  Stages II – IV may be resorted to in the beginning. The scheme will thus build a pipeline to supply quality faculty to  our Institutions of higher learning in  all branches of knowledge at a very affordable cost without any major new  investments in infrastructure. The present strategy of poaching teachers from  elsewhere is unlikely to take us far.\\

“Management Education Can’t Rely Upon Outdated Nostrums”

Professor Philip Taylor, Academic Director of Programmes, Strathcylde SKIL Business School shared his thoughts and views on the Indian education scenario and their roadmap for the Indian market with Pragya Gupta. Excerpts:

How do you see India as a market for higher education?

All informed commentators, including the Government of India, acknowledge that the demand for higher education is set to grow significantly in the short to medium term. For the next few decades, India’s population will remain young, and higher education will be needed to equip them to play their rightful roles in the knowledge economy. Due to the economic growth in the Indian economy, and as more and more families join the relatively better off sections of society, the demand for higher education is likely to grow at an accelerated pace.  Expansion will grow apace particularly in the area of business and management studies at both undergraduate and postgraduate levels.

What pedagogical innovations are you planning to bring in India?

Strathclyde SKIL Business School (SBSS) is adopting a unique and coherent approach to delivering education in India through our state-of-the-art campus in Greater Noida. This is not an off-shored facility but a fully integrated campus within the University of Strathclyde that has a unique partnership with SKIL.

A key element in our pedagogy is the importance of delivering high quality education that applies theoretical knowledge emanating from cutting edge research to concrete practical setting. Strathclyde’s philosophy is best encapsulated in the fulfilment of its mission as ‘The Place of Useful Learning’. This underlying principle will inform the first programme to be delivered by SBSS, the Master in Management which commences in September 2011, and the Bachelor in Business Studies which follows in September 2012 and then the MBA in September 2013.

What are the challenges enduring in the Indian market? What are the key issues that need to be addressed to produce more skilled and quality workforce?

The main challenge in the Indian market is to ensure that the demand for business and management undergraduate and postgraduate education can be fulfilled by premium provision which ensures that students are able to access the highest quality learning experience.

Managers in the contemporary Indian context face the enormous challenge of leading their organisations in conditions of rapid change. Indeed it could be argued that the only constant is change. It follows that the emerging generation of business and management graduates and postgraduates are equipped with ability to apply their knowledge in complex and contradictory situations.

How can management education in India be reinvented in a way that can project it to the forefront of leadership and management training worldwide?

Management education in India cannot consist of rote learning or rely upon outdated nostrums. Successful managers must be able to draw upon the knowledge derived from the very cutting edge of critical management research and be steeped in an approach which understands the vital need for creative application of problem solving based upon that knowledge. In this sense advanced theoretical understanding based upon contemporary research is of great necessity for informed managerial and business practice.

What are your expectations from the Indian government?

We believe that the Indian Government is very focussed on the importance of making education available to the Indian population across all geographies and at all levels. In order to do this, we are seeing the Government moving away from what was largely a prescriptive regime towards a more participative environment where the learners and educators are able to interactively decide what the content of education needs to be, and how this should be designed and delivered so that it can be harnessed for the betterment of both society and the individual. We expect this trend to continue and indeed accelerate both in scope and pace. 

Please share you plans and roadmap for the Indian market?

India is a focus area for us, and we see the Indian market to be one of the core areas for us. We have started with management education in Greater Noida, and over the span of the next three years, we will be rapidly expanding the scope to cover undergraduate students and persons with experience with the BBS and the MBA programmes. Our plans are to set up other centres across India in the years ahead, and also to expand the disciplines to cover Science and Engineering, other subjects in which the University of Strathclyde is a recognised leader.

Kindly shed light on the reason for the collaboration between SKIL and Strathclyde?

SKIL Infrastructure is one of the leading infrastructure developers in India. In our early discussions, it became evident that SKIL was bringing the practical perspective from India to the equation. This is critical in any such venture

"Higher Education Drives and is Driven by Globalisation" : Prof K S Rangappa, Vice Chancellor – Karnataka State Open University

Prof K S Rangappa, the Vice Chancellor of Karnataka State Open University has three decades of research and teaching experience as Junior and Senior Research Fellow, Lecturer, Reader, Professor and Director at Post Graduate Department of Chemistry, University of Mysore. Prof. K S Rangappa highlights evolving higher education in India and role of ICT in an interview with Pragya Gupta, digitalLEARNING bureau

How do you see higher education evolving in India with respect to global scenario?

Globalisation is changing the structure of higher education radically by moving the services across boundaries, instead of the movement of people across the borders as witnessed earlier. Such migration of education from its location to new locations in search of clients is necessitating institutions of higher education in India to reorganise themselves to withstand the competition from the developed countries. Globalisation helps realise the benefits of free trade, and thus comparative advantage and the division of labour. It is also supposed to enhance efficiency and productivity. In this context there is a need for a common table to discuss the issues and challenges faced in higher education, the World Education Summit 2011 event is an answer to this.

One response to the danger of losing one’s job due to the erosion of professional qualifications or to the loss of markets, causing the breakdown of enterprises, is to increase the average level of active population qualifications. This could be accomplished through both enhanced initial education and training and through expansion of continuing education. The latter will involve upgrading, extending or reconverting professional knowledge and skills, in order to keep abreast of market needs, either as an employee or a self-employed person. Higher education should be able to produce, in the long run, enough graduates to assure that they reach roughly one-half of the active population. Continuing education and training should take the shape of genuinely learning, touching not only the whole occupationally active population but also all remaining members of the civil society.

  • Prof. Rangappa received his PhD from the University of Mysore (1982) and has been awarded the DSc degree by the University of Mysore for his independent research contribution (1998). He is the Fellow of The Royal Society of Chemistry (FRSC; UK) and Fellow of National Academy of Sciences (FNASc) India. 

  • Apart from the research activities of his own group, he has developed several National and International (Indo

    “ODL will be an Important Tool for Improving GER” : Shri Amit Khare, Joint Secretary, Bureau of BP & CR Education Policy UNESCO, INC & ICC, Department of Higher Education, Government of India

    Shri Amit Khare, Joint Secretary, Bureau of BP & CR Education Policy UNESCO, INC & ICC, Department of Higher Education, Government of India, in conversation with Sheena Joseph provides updates on the latest buzz in the higher education sector

    What are the areas in which your department has been focusing on, with specific reference to international partnership in the field of higher education?

    In the field of international partnership, we are looking at the mobility of faculty as well as students in both directions. When people largely talk about the entry of foreign educational institutions in India, what is not being talked about is that we have our own efforts in spreading education abroad. Some of our private universities have already opened campuses abroad. We are also receiving requests from some countries for opening our Institutions like IITs in their country. In Africa, another initiative has been announced by the Honorable Prime Minister covering two institutions; one is the African Institute for Education Planning and second would be the African Institute of Information Technology. Given our strength in IT, a project has also been approved by the government for an Indo-East Africa Virtual University, which will be anchored by IGNOU. So, while it is true that more than scores of Indian students go to the U.S., Australia, UK and other places for education, we can also affirm that more than 40 thousand students come to India. We are looking at both these developments. We are trying to internationalise our universities and institutions so that the students could get international experience. At the same time these exchanges are very crucial for research collaborations and for faculty development. Some of the important collaborations, which we already have are the UK-India Education Research Initiative (UKIERI), Obama-Singh Knowledge Initiative with USA. Also we have collaborations with Australia and New Zealand in terms of higher education and vocational education. In addition, we have 33 bilateral and multi-lateral agreements with different countries. While we want to benefit from the experiences of other countries, at the same time, we want to share our tremendous expertise particularly in ICT with rest of the world.

    In terms of different collaborations like UKIERI and Obama-Singh Knowledge Initiative, what are the implications of these for universities, students and teachers in India and abroad?

    The collaborations include different components. Setting up of foreign university campuses will be one of the components. Other elements, for example, include that of student mobility and recognition of international degrees. Similarly, quality assurance is another component which is to be considered so that the standard of education is benchmarked and it can match up to international standards. Innovative projects and joint degree programs have also been covered in different phases and it all depends from country to country. Some countries are more focused on higher education while some other countries are looking for collaboration in the area of school education.

    How significant has international collaborations been in school education?

    Some of the countries are actually quite keen to develop their curriculum in the area of science and mathematics based on the India curriculum framework. There may be several differences in Social Science subjects between countries but as far as Science and Mathematics are concerned, the fundamentals are common all over the world and particularly the Indian expertise and the quality of textbooks of NCERT are well appreciated. These countries are looking forward to curriculum development, textbook development and also training of their teachers as master trainers in India.

    If foreign universities are allowed to set campuses in India, how can we ensure that the quality in education is maintained?

    A Foreign Education Institutions Bill has sufficient safeguards so that the detrimental variety of institutions is not allowed to enter. Secondly, all institutions will have to be accredited, which will put a big break and it will be a stopper to ensure that the Institutions which are not of requisite quality are not able to enter India. AICTE, UGC, and NAAC have a major role to play in order to ensure due quality processed and accreditation is maintained. We want quality not only of the foreign institutions in India but also Indian institutions in India.

    Recently we had controversies regarding IITs and IIMs not coming up to the standards. What are your views in regard to that? 

    I cannot make any political comment but the very fact that three countries have requested us formally through their education ministers to have an IIT like institution set up in their country. This itself is a proof that our institutions are regarded world over otherwise I don’t think these countries would have requested us to open such institutions in their countries.

    In terms of enrollment,  India has among the largest number of students in the higher education institutions but the Gross Enrollment Ration is much less as compared to global standards. Do you think that international universities coming in are going to increase the percentage?

    It may not increase the Gross Enrollment Ratio (GER) to a large extent because the numbers would be very small. Their major contribution will be more on the quality side and new type of questions they will bring in to India. Secondly, many students who are going to other countries and rough estimate shows that approximately US $5-6 billion are spent by Indian students abroad. Entry of foreign educational institutes will help us retain our talent and wealth in India.

    What are your views on open and distance learning education in the field of higher education and international collaborations?

    Open and distance learning education will be an important tool for improving the gross enrolment ratio in India. Now different countries are in different stages of development. Perhaps the western countries may not require distance learning to that extent because they have well developed infrastructure in the conventional system but countries like ours where expansion in conventional system will be very costly, distance education will provide not only access in remote areas but also access to quality education.

    The quality which is available in the IITs and central universities, the same content can be transmitted to the rural areas. So, that’s why distance education offers a lot of scope and secondly after few years although is not very predominant in India but in some years time there will be a trend of ‘relearning at the middle level’.  The changing technologies and changing markets have created a situation where a person may have to relearn or retrain himself as a ‘mid-course or mid-career’ option. So, there again it will be distance education which will provide these free learning opportunity. Therefore, distance learning is bound to play a very important role in India.

    Shri Amit Khare got selected for the IAS in 1985 Batch (Jharkhand Cadre). He has over 24 years of experience in Government including HRD, Revenue, Finance and General Administration, some of them being Principal Secretary to Governor, Jharkhand, Secretary HRD, Government of Jharkhand, Addl. Finance Commissioner,Government of Jharkhand.

    At present, he is holding the charge of Joint Secretary, Bureau of BP & CR Education Policy UNESCO, INC & ICC in the Development of Higher Education in the Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India since 28th August, 2009 and has also been taking part in bilateral as also multi-lateral dialogues and negotiations and interacting with UNESCO and WIPO.

    He obtained his B. Sc (Hons) degree in Physics from St. Stephen’s College, Delhi University and has a post graduate degree in Management from IIM Ahmedabad.

    360 Degree Approach on Higher Education : Smt Vibha Puri Das, Secretary- Department of Higher Education, India


    Smt Vibha Puri Das
    Secretary, Department of Higher Education

    Smt Vibha Puri Das, Secretary, Department of Higher Education is an IAS officer of the year 1976 batch, Uttaranchal Cadre (then Uttar Pradesh), India. Prior to this posting, she was Additional Secretary, Department of Personnel and Training.

    Smt. Das addressed various educational issues and highlighted the Ministry’s initiatives over a tea with Dr. Rajeshree Dutta Kumar

    How is your department addressing the partial disconnect between school education system and higher education system and that of higher education and industry’s requirements?

    I think, this is the time when we are looking at education in a seamless way, from start to finish, from Right to Education (RTE) through Universalisation of Rashtriya Madhyamik Shiksha Abhiyan, that is, secondary education and towards a huge unprecedented expansion of higher education, so that all of them fit into one comprehensive vision for Education. The fact is that we have huge demographic dividends available to this country and similarly we are going to be well placed in terms of the numbers of primary school leavers and in a few years from now the secondary school leavers who are going to be significantly higher in number than any time in the past. So, we have to be ready with our higher education system to receive the much larger number that is in terms of quantitative dimension. Looking at the qualitative dimension, again the seamless connect is quite evident. The whole issue of Comprehensive and Continuous Evaluation (CCE), and the core curriculum that is cutting across different school boards, constitute an emphasis on quality as well as renewed emphasis on school education. To rededicate ourselves to the importance of schooling and quality of school education has been the dominant feature in the recent past. The Quality Initiatives in the 11th Plan have focused on this dimension. So, we need to factor that when we look into higher education scenario, what are the kinds of kids that we are getting into higher education system? Are they well prepared in the school education? Do they have to face lot of stress in the school education system? Do they have a large number of Entrance Examination and multiplicity of preparatory tests, which they have to go through? Addressing all these issues are an essential feature of how and what kind of kids we get into the higher education system. So, this has been done so far and now we are looking at streamlining and rationalising the tests that are envisioned for the entry to higher education. I think the seamless connect across different segments of education has never been so well articulated as it is today.

    Smt. Das is an M.A. in Political Science from the Jawaharlal Nehru University. She has also done a Certificate Course in International Approaches to Rural Development and Poverty Alleviation in the Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, UK.

    She has served the Central Government as Joint Secretary, Ministry of Food Processing Industries, and Executive Director, Central Social Welfare Board. Her other postings have included serving as Principal Secretary and Commissioner, Forest and Rural Development, Uttaranchal and Principal Secretary, Home and Transport of Uttaranchal.

    She has also been Additional Chief Executive officer of the Greater Noida Authority, Vice Chairperson, Ghaziabad Development Authority, and Special Secretary (Finance), Government of U.P.

    Please throw some light on Education reforms that have happened ever since this government has taken hold?

    When the present government took office, the Presidential address, to the two houses of parliament in June 09, indicated that we would be coming with a new regulator for higher education. Constituting the National Council for Higher Education and Research (NCHER) has been the motive of entire reform process that ministry has dedicated itself to, over the last two years. In the first 100 days, the action plan, that the Minister set for this ministry, was the working of legislative reforms, polity reforms and the introduction of the schemes, which were necessary in the 11th plan. So, all the three dimensions that ministry really works in, i.e. the legislative sphere, the polity sphere, and the programme sphere, have been targeted in our approach to reforms.

    What are the Education reforms that you have taken or introduced?

    In broader terms what the ministry is working towards is providing the necessary autonomy to educational institution because higher education institutions have to function in a sphere where they are completely free from any outside or government control whether in terms of their internal administration, their financial autonomy, their academic autonomy. The Academic autonomy has never been in question, they have completely been autonomous. But, steadily we are increasing and empowering them to see that whatever improvements we can do in terms of their financial and administrative autonomy, we should be able to provide. This is in a larger and in broader direction of reform. Secondly, we find that coming from NCHER, the regulatory mechanism needs to be clearly defined so that the space for each setup institution is clear. Educational Institutions have their space, the regulator has its space, the Government has its own space and we all work in our defined arenas. So, it is in this context that the NCHER is envisioned. The other legislations that we have on the unveil is the prevention of the unfair practice, the mandatory accreditations. The foreign education providers, of course, is a different league altogether. It has nothing to do with quality as such within the domestic domain but it is about enhancing the total number, may be quality by extension. So the direction of reforms in the last couple of year has been clearly of autonomy for transparency, for more accountable institutions and for a total academic experience of quality education.


    “The whole issue of Comprehensive and Continuous Evaluation (CCE), and the core curriculum that is cutting across different school boards, constitute an emphasis on quality as well as renewed emphasis on school education”


    Please give comprehensive overview of your department’s role on the entire promotion of Gross Enrollment Ratio (GER)?

    GER is the function of total number of children in the age group of 18-24 and the proportion of these children who are actually going for enrollment in higher education. It is largely observed that the a large proportion of kids, who complete class 12 , do come into higher education. The number is enhancing at every stage, so the RTE guarantee that many more children qualify at the end of primary school, the secondary education guarantee that many more children qualify at the end of secondary education and therefore, the number is in increasing. Otherwise if you look at it, about 70 percent of the school leavers do get enrolled for higher education but the total number of school leavers still does remain small. So, we need to grow the number in both place and then we need to grow the opportunities available for children to get into higher education.

    We have adequate number of hostels so that children do not have to travel too far especially for women as they have problem of travelling in the Indian context, we have special schemes for women hostels. Then, the whole issue of distance Education to ensure that those kids who cannot really afford to attend morning to evening programme of study are able to do it on a flexi time/ anytime learning mode. To my mind the most important mode is technology enabled learning, which is of course the ICT. It is a transforming platform which will reach larger number, enhance quality, and multiply opportunities. So, to my mind these are the different areas where we are looking at growing the numbers.

    What are the measures taken to ensure quality education to the larger population? How much of quality are we looking at?

    We are certainly addressing the quality dimension as I said earlier right from school onwards into higher education. Within higher education, seeing that the faculties are well qualified, the regulations from University Grants Commission (UGC) have been made stringent. Regulations from All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE) have been changed to ensure that to teach in Engineering College, a doctoral degree is a mandatory. So, the whole minimum threshold criteria for having qualified teacher have been enhanced. The salary structure for teachers has been enhanced so much that it has become one of the most attractive destinations in terms of financial package available to teachers. So, we are trying to make both the living conditions and working conditions better, to improve the compensation package and infrastructure availability.


    “all the three dimensions that ministry really works in, i.e. the legislative sphere, the polity sphere, and the programme sphere, have been targeted in our approach to reforms”


    Do you think universities should have mandate to produce industry ready knowledge and workforce?

    I think industry should not assume that universities have mandate to produce people who are industry ready. Universities have to produce graduates or post graduates based on comprehensive societal perception; it is not about putting up graduates who fit in into the industry requirements. It is not something, which any self-respecting university worldwide would do, because universities are not polytechnic that will be manufacturing employees for the industrial workforce.

    They are in the business of producing educated citizenry. Now, from the educated citizenry, it is for prospective employer to see that kids have the basic skills set; what are the add-ons that they need to give to them so that they become industry ready. So, I think that industry would need to invest in Post-Education Training. We cannot clearly have the universities mandated to produce for each and every kind of employer profile. But, at the same time we are trying to make provision ensuring the engineering and professional graduates are equipped with industry ready skill sets. For Education as a whole, I think they need to have a broad canvas in mind.

    We have set the target of over 500 million skilled youth by 2020. How are you going about it?

    There are no two ways about it. I think scaling of the economy has to be addressed and we are working at it in developing the National Vocational Education Qualification Framework, which will help kids to go laterally, diagonally, vertically, and have multiple pathways of moving from educational to vocational, back to education from vocational and so on. It is going to be the mark of an educated society where kids can learn things, which are relevant for them to get a job and they also have adequate skills to expand the mind and get educated. We are working on the parallel platforms because up to class 8th it is mandatory education for all. But secondary education and beyond can be mixed with skills, polytechnic education so as to see that those numbers are put through into our education. AICTE has improved and modified their regulations to have polytechnic as part of engineering colleges. We have Polytechnic skilling process provided through the digital learning platform so that can be done through remote learning.

    I think apart from the expansion in the polytechnic; there is going to be an expansion of at least 1000 new polytechnic over the 11th plan period. Around 300 in the government sector, 300 in Public-Private-Partnership mode and another 400 in private sector. So, total number of at least 1000 extra polytechnic will be set up, which will power the way to skill Enhancement.

    Building Excellence in Education : Smt D Purandeswari, Minister of State, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, India

    Smt D Purandeswari,
    Minister of State, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India

    Smt D Purandeswari, Minister of State, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India shares plans, outreach and challenges in education while talking to Dr Rajeshree Dutta Kumar and Pragya Gupta

    Please share your views on ideal scenario of education system in India.

    First, we must remember that education is the fastest driver of socio-economic change. It is very important that we have a very strong education system that will support our needs and requirements and also support country’s growth and development. In order to respond to the challenges and issues within our own country, we need to bring in reforms in our education system.  Education system introduced by colonial rulers had outgrown its relevance and there was grave necessity to put an education system in place that addresses our requirements.

    The University Education Commission was thereby constituted under the leadership of Prof S Radhakrishnan. His recommendations emphasised that the then education system did not have any relevance and did not relate to modernity. He urged that the education system must change itself according to the needs and requirements of the nation.  More than 50 years after, time has now arrived to bring in changes in order to suit the needs of our education system.

    Globalisation is a reality and is here to stay, entailing that there is a need to prepare children not only to support the growth and development of the country but also that of the globe. This indicates the need to churn out global citizens. In view of that we are now looking to bring  changes in the education. I would like to call the current education scenario interseting and challenging. Interesting because of exponential expansion in education sector be it elementary, secondary or higher education and challenging because not only do we need to firm up our education system to ensure that that they grow as global citizens.

    Can you share with us the initiatives undertaken by your Ministry? 

    The ministry has made significant achievements under the leadership of Shri Kapil Sibal as he set a 100 days target so that we can achieve it without any complacency seeping into the system. That is how we have been bringing certain legislations like RTE (Right to Education) bill and were able to do amendments. We are looking at the exponential expansion in higher education sector.  We are now looking into different bills to come in.  We are looking at Education Tribunal bill. We are looking at Foreign Education Provider bill, which is presently there with the law ministry. Once it will be recognised by them it will be introduced. We are looking at establishing an education tribunal to address the issues, which education institutions faced. Suppose if there is a professor or teacher in a college or school who feels that their terms were not fulfilled or they were misled, they can approach the tribunal. Because we do not want institution to be hanged in a courtroom for long to get their cases resolved. Rather, we want fast track tool in education institution.

    We are also looking at Prevention of Education Malpractices Act. The students who have been cheated by the institution or if they find that said conditions have not been fulfilled in terms of faculty, infrastructure, fee, etc., then the students can take them to court with this act. I am sure parliament will support this bill, which will bring great change in the education system.

    How can our children cater to the global requirements in the light of shortage of skilled workforce? How can industry support us?

    Children must support the requirements of our country first then they can go to become global citizen. There has been an apprehension that there is a great gap between what the universities are offering, the industry and market requirements and what universities are churning out. There has been a long debate. My own experience says that four-five years ago when we opened dialogue with private sector to come to the table and discuss about their needs so that we can put them into operation, we did not see enthusiasm by private sector or the industry then.

    But today we see that the private sector is willing to come forward and we also want to stretch out our hands to them and sit together to discuss with them so that our children should get meaningful education. It is happening because today both of us look at it as a win-win situation. We considers it as a win-win situation because we are ensuring children employment. If we work with industry then we will ensure providing children with gainful employment. Industry considers it as a win-win situation because unless we give them quality education, there will not be quality  manpower out of university. So the situation is such that both of us have to sit together.

    What are the initiatives taken by your Ministry for promoting vocational education?

    Vocational stream is also the focus today. Honourable Prime Minister has emphasised that we need to up skill 500 million children by 2020. The Skill Development Council has been constituted and it is under the review and purview of Prime Minister’s Office (PMO). Skill development is spread across 17 ministries and departments, and in order to avoid overlapping, the PMO has taken the responsibility to coordinate and review the situation.

    Under the skill development mission we have Polytechnics. This mission concentrates and focuses on skill development. In this processes, we can now see piecemeal development happening but there is no proper certification available. When it comes to skills that our children have actually acquired, we feel  that the certification is important as this certificate will be recognised wherever the child goes across the length and breadth of the country. Probably, we will think of tying up with the international bodies as well. Presently, we are focusing on children’s skills being recognised and they be given due employment.

    Secondly there would be no exploitation of any child. Today, if a child does not undergo formal education system, his / her skills are not recognised and there is an exploitation and under payment. National Vocational Education Qualification Framework (NVEQF) has been constituted, which will probably be the national body that will certify the skills acquired by students. We have opened dialogue with various industrial sectors so that we could work together. We want them to give us guidance in the form of curriculum that a sector requires.

    We also have to see how do we integrate vocational education to conventional education. A child after sometime may realise that he is interested in going back to college, and it will not be possible unless we establish a connect between the two. Unless this connection happens, we do not think that there will be respect and dignity that will be given to vocational education. It has been looked down as a stream where ‘not so good’ children go. So that apprehension should be dispelled and dignity should be given to vocational education.

    We interacted openly with sectors like automotive, IT, ITES, Construction and are looking forward to interact with hospitality sector also. These are sectors that generate lot of employment. We are looking at different levels of skills required in each sector. We have constituted a committee to be a part of NVEQF and asked them to give us direction on the curriculum and testing of the skills of the children .

    Do you see any direct relationship between conventional higher education system and that of vocational?

    We do want them to be in relation with each other. Unless, we give the child vertical or horizontal mobility, in vocational education, which will give options like multi entry and multi exit, the child will not want to come into vocational education. Today we cannot have children who just come out of secondary school education and get into the higher education where there is no employment opportunity for them. We rather have them skilled and then gainfully employed to offer better support to their families and contributing to the growth of the country.


    “Prevention of Education Malpractices Act will lend a hand to the children who have been cheated by the institution”

    Do you advocate Vocational education for schools?

    Yes. It will give the child a feel of what vocational education is. The Central Board of Secondary Education (CBSE) has already incorporated vocational education into the curriculum at the level of secondary education. A child in class 8th to 10th is already exposed to vocational stream. It helps in exploring the child’s latent talent. Once the child gets the feel of Vocational education then the child can take it up further too.

    Can you share with us the impact on GER (Gross Enrolment Ratio)?

    Drop out ratio in school education has seen positive changes as it has came down.  For GER, we go according to the census and 2001 census has revealed that GER in Higher Education is not more than 12.4 percent. Today, it is expected to be around 14 percent, according to general estimate, since we have not got the figures in hand. Various surveys have emphasised that if our economy has to be sustainable, then GER needs to be 20 percent whereas international average is 23 percent. All developed countries are anywhere between 40-70 percent. So we know there is herculean task ahead of us. Vocational education can help in achieving GER in one aspect. Distance education can help us achieving our target. These are various aspects within the education sector that can help us in achieving GER but we also have to look at the literacy level.  Presently, literacy level is around 65 percent and we want to enhance it to 80 percent. In terms of diversity it is a challenge to reach out to diverse sectors. So even 65 percent achievement, keeping in mind the multitudnal diversity of the country, is a wonderful feeling. Of course we can not get complacent. We have to set a target of 80 percent for the literacy level. So the distance education, the vocational education, and the skill development mission will help us to achieving the set literacy rate target.

    The mandate of Right to Education enhances the accessibility of Education. Does the act address quality and quantity aspects?

    Right to Education addresses both qualitative and quantitative aspect of education. Quantitative in terms of improving accessibility. Through SSA (Sarva Siksha Abhiyan),  to a large extent, our focus has been on accessibility because accessibility, equity and quality are the key pillars of our education system.

    First is accessibility, unless we have children coming to school, we cannot talk about quality. So all our focus has been on how we make education accessible. We need to create the infrastructure so that the child can actually access the school within the kilometer range for an elementary level. Since, we have reached that quantitative in SSA, we are now looking at secondary education and we have the flagship programme RMSA (Rashtriya Madhyamik Siksha Abhiyan) where we are looking at lower primary, lower secondary school at every three kilometers and higher secondary school at every five kilometers. Now that is also a herculean task keeping the geographical largeness of the country and the numbers and demographies in the country.

    In this regard, we have also requested the state governments because RTE is not the legislation that is going to be only implemented by Government of India. It is the legislation, which is going to be implemented closely with the state governments. So the state governments need to play their part very effectively and responsibly. We have asked them to have GIS (Geographical Information System) mapping of all the schools for the citizens to know where the schools should be and what we mean by neighborhood schools. Because there are areas in some states where all the schools probably are concentrated in a particular place. It is very important to address the geographical disparity.

    After we have addressed the quantity, our focus is on quality. Now if you look at RTE bill very closely, we can not have quality education being given to our children unless we have qualitative teachers in the class. RTE lays down the qualifications for the teachers. It also says that teacher have to pass the Teacher Eligibility Test (TET), which has been introduced by NCTE (National Council for Teacher Education), a nodal organisation to lay down the qualification for the teachers to be covered under RTE. We are ensuring the qualitative teachers are now going to be put in place.

    NIOS (Natinal Institute of Open Schooling) should ensure, as an open schooling system, to impart skill oriented programme that may give age relevant coaching to the child to be brought into the conventional education. As far as quality is concerned, once we have qualitative teachers in place, we have great organisation like (NCERT) National Council for Education, Research and Training, which is going to come up with National Curriculum Framework widely respected by all states and across the country.

    LATEST NEWS